Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

Choose providersEvidence Index

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldZodia CustodyEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryDigital Asset Custodians
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • Luxembourg / EEA
Regulators / authorities
  • Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF); passport visible via AMF
Regimes / permissions
  • MiCA / CASP
  • MiCA Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP)
Documented services
  • Custody
  • Staking
Security certifications
  • SOC 1
  • SOC 2
  • ISO 27001
Regulatory evidenceZodia Custody Europe S.A. appears on the AMF MiCA whitelist following authorization by Luxembourg CSSF.
Security evidenceZodia publishes SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type I and ISO 27001:2022 assurance/certification.
Asset protection evidenceZodia describes institutional insurance protection; exact legal segregation and policy terms should be verified for the contracting entity.
Procurement caveatStandard Chartered announced acquisition of Zodia Custody’s custody business in May 2026; confirm the current contracting entity and integration status.

Shortlist summary

Zodia Custody — Digital Asset Custodians — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.