Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

Choose providersEvidence Index

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldZerohashEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryDigital Asset Custodians
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • United States — North Carolina
Regulators / authorities
  • North Carolina trust-company framework
Regimes / permissions
  • US state trust
  • NY BitLicense / other registrations
  • Non-depository trust company
Documented services
  • Custody
  • Stablecoin services
Security certifications
  • SOC 1
  • SOC 2
  • ISO 27001
Regulatory evidenceZero Hash documentation states that Zero Hash Trust is a North Carolina-chartered non-depository trust company; the group also holds U.S. money-transmission/BitLicense permissions and other registrations.
Security evidenceZero Hash publishes SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022 and Regulation SCI-related assurance/control coverage.
Asset protection evidenceCustody documentation states client assets are held in segregated accounts and not commingled with company funds; wallet- or ledger-level segregation options are described.
Procurement caveatDifferentiate Zero Hash LLC, Zero Hash Trust and non-U.S. group entities when assessing licences and safeguarding.

Shortlist summary

Zerohash — Digital Asset Custodians — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.