Shortlist comparison
Compare institutional custody providers
Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.
| Comparison field | UpvestEvidence reviewed |
|---|---|
| Directory category | Digital Asset Custodians |
| Custody model | B2B custody / investment infrastructure |
| Directory verification | unverified |
| Research status | Primary-source evidence reviewed |
| Regulatory jurisdictions | Not yet structured |
| Regulators / authorities | Not yet structured |
| Regimes / permissions |
|
| Documented services |
|
| Security certifications | Not yet structured |
| Regulatory evidence | Upvest states it holds BaFin licences covering securities and crypto brokerage and custody and can provide custody within B2B operating models. |
| Security evidence | Public material establishes licensing and operating-model controls but this review did not establish a public custody-specific security certification set. |
| Asset protection evidence | Asset custody can be provided under Upvest’s regulated model; exact segregation and contractual treatment should be verified in the client agreement. |
| Procurement caveat | Whether Upvest or the B2B client performs a specific regulated role depends on the selected operating model and product. |
Shortlist summary
Upvest — Digital Asset Custodians — evidence reviewedImportant: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.