Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

Choose providersEvidence Index

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldUBS Digital AssetsEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryCustody Banks
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • Switzerland
Regulators / authorities
  • FINMA
Regimes / permissions
  • FINMA bank
  • Bank
Documented services
  • Custody
Security certificationsNot yet structured
Regulatory evidenceUBS is a regulated global bank; its digital-asset offering is delivered within bank and securities-service frameworks.
Security evidencePublic UBS material reviewed here does not provide sufficient product-specific security assurance detail for a standalone crypto-custody rating.
Asset protection evidenceThe reviewed evidence concerns regulated tokenized financial products rather than a universal third-party cryptocurrency safeguarding model.
Procurement caveatEvidence is strongest for tokenized financial instruments. Confirm whether the intended mandate involves tokenized securities or native crypto assets.

Shortlist summary

UBS Digital Assets — Custody Banks — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.