Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

Choose providersEvidence Index

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldTaurusEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryDigital Asset Custodians
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • Switzerland
Regulators / authorities
  • FINMA
Regimes / permissions
  • Technology / entity-specific
  • Securities firm
Documented services
  • Custody
  • Trading
  • Tokenization
Security certificationsNot yet structured
Regulatory evidenceTaurus provides institutional custody/tokenization infrastructure; this review does not independently certify the regulatory status of every Taurus entity or customer deployment.
Security evidenceTaurus publishes ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification for its information-security management system.
Asset protection evidenceTaurus provides institutional custody technology; legal segregation and insolvency treatment depend on the regulated service/entity used.
Procurement caveatTreat technology-provider capability and regulated-custodian status as separate procurement questions.

Shortlist summary

Taurus — Digital Asset Custodians — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.