Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

Choose providersEvidence Index

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldTanganyEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryDigital Asset Custodians
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • Germany / EEA
Regulators / authorities
  • BaFin; passport visible via AMF
Regimes / permissions
  • MiCA / CASP
  • MiCA Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP)
Documented services
  • Custody
Security certifications
  • ISO 27001
Regulatory evidenceTangany GmbH appears on the AMF MiCA whitelist following authorization by BaFin and markets itself as a MiCA-licensed German custodian.
Security evidenceTangany publishes ISO 27001 certification and HSM/MPC custody security controls.
Asset protection evidenceCustody architecture is documented by Tangany; insolvency treatment and insurance scope should be verified in current contractual documentation.
Procurement caveatConfirm the specific MiCA services and asset scope applicable to the mandate.

Shortlist summary

Tangany — Digital Asset Custodians — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.