Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

Choose providersEvidence Index

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldSygnumEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryDigital Asset Custodians
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • Switzerland
Regulators / authorities
  • FINMA
Regimes / permissions
  • FINMA bank
  • Bank
Documented services
  • Custody
Security certificationsNot yet structured
Regulatory evidenceThis review focuses on Sygnum’s bank custody platform; the exact licence/perimeter for each jurisdiction should be checked against the contracting entity.
Security evidenceSygnum has published ISAE 3402 Type II assurance for its multi-custody platform and ISAE 3000 assurance for key ceremonies.
Asset protection evidenceSpecific current segregation/insurance terms were not independently verified in this review.
Procurement caveatVerify contracting entity, jurisdiction and the custody model selected.

Shortlist summary

Sygnum — Digital Asset Custodians — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.