Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldSwissquote CustodyEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryDigital Asset Custodians
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • Switzerland
Regulators / authorities
  • FINMA
Regimes / permissions
  • FINMA bank
  • Bank
Documented services
  • Custody
  • Wallet infrastructure
  • Trading
Security certificationsNot yet structured
Regulatory evidenceSwissquote operates regulated banking/financial entities; group disclosures identify regulated entities providing custodian services that include crypto assets.
Security evidenceSwissquote describes multi-signature controls, offline cryptographic material and access-control architecture for crypto safeguarding.
Asset protection evidenceCustody is integrated into regulated Swissquote account structures; exact entity, segregation and compensation/insurance treatment depend on the client jurisdiction.
Procurement caveatConfirm the legal entity and custody model for the buyer’s country; Swissquote group entities do not all have identical permissions.

Shortlist summary

Swissquote Custody — Digital Asset Custodians — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.