Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldSociété Générale FORGEEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryCustody Banks
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • France / EEA
Regulators / authorities
  • Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF)
Regimes / permissions
  • MiCA / CASP
  • MiCA Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP)
Documented services
  • Custody
  • Stablecoin services
Security certificationsNot yet structured
Regulatory evidenceSG-FORGE states that it is a French investment firm licensed as a Crypto-Asset Service Provider and authorized for custody and administration of crypto-assets.
Security evidenceSG-FORGE has publicly described institutional custody technology integrations, including orchestration through Metaco infrastructure; product-level assurance evidence should still be requested.
Asset protection evidenceThe regulated custody authorization creates a defined legal service perimeter, but contractual segregation and insolvency treatment remain mandate-specific.
Procurement caveatConfirm the exact service, asset eligibility and contracting entity because SG-FORGE spans tokenized securities, stablecoin and crypto-asset activities.

Shortlist summary

Société Générale FORGE — Custody Banks — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.