Shortlist comparison
Compare institutional custody providers
Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.
| Comparison field | Société Générale FORGEEvidence reviewed |
|---|---|
| Directory category | Custody Banks |
| Custody model | Custodial |
| Directory verification | unverified |
| Research status | Primary-source evidence reviewed |
| Regulatory jurisdictions |
|
| Regulators / authorities |
|
| Regimes / permissions |
|
| Documented services |
|
| Security certifications | Not yet structured |
| Regulatory evidence | SG-FORGE states that it is a French investment firm licensed as a Crypto-Asset Service Provider and authorized for custody and administration of crypto-assets. |
| Security evidence | SG-FORGE has publicly described institutional custody technology integrations, including orchestration through Metaco infrastructure; product-level assurance evidence should still be requested. |
| Asset protection evidence | The regulated custody authorization creates a defined legal service perimeter, but contractual segregation and insolvency treatment remain mandate-specific. |
| Procurement caveat | Confirm the exact service, asset eligibility and contracting entity because SG-FORGE spans tokenized securities, stablecoin and crypto-asset activities. |
Shortlist summary
Société Générale FORGE — Custody Banks — evidence reviewedImportant: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.
