Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldNomura DigitalEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryDigital Asset Custodians
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictionsNot yet structured
Regulators / authoritiesNot yet structured
Regimes / permissions
  • Entity-, product- and jurisdiction-specific
Documented services
  • Digital-asset investment and trading
  • Custody venture exposure
  • Institutional digital-asset services
Security certificationsNot yet structured
Regulatory evidenceNomura's digital-asset ecosystem includes specialist businesses such as Laser Digital and the Komainu custody venture; the group brand is not itself the custody contract.
Security evidenceOnly controls explicitly stated in the cited primary sources should be relied on; request current assurance reports during due diligence.
Asset protection evidenceIdentify the operating entity, normally a specialist affiliate or venture, and do not transfer its licences to Nomura Holdings generally.
Procurement caveatIdentify the operating entity, normally a specialist affiliate or venture, and do not transfer its licences to Nomura Holdings generally.

Shortlist summary

Nomura Digital — Digital Asset Custodians — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.