Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

Choose providersEvidence Index

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldNAB Digital AssetsEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryCustody Banks
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictionsNot yet structured
Regulators / authoritiesNot yet structured
Regimes / permissions
  • Entity-, product- and jurisdiction-specific
Documented services
  • Bank digital-asset initiatives
  • Traditional banking
Security certificationsNot yet structured
Regulatory evidenceThis review did not establish a current general digital-asset custody service from NAB primary materials.
Security evidenceOnly controls explicitly stated in the cited primary sources should be relied on; request current assurance reports during due diligence.
Asset protection evidenceKeep as a discovery record only. Require a current official product page, contracting entity and custody terms before comparison or introduction.
Procurement caveatKeep as a discovery record only. Require a current official product page, contracting entity and custody terms before comparison or introduction.

Shortlist summary

NAB Digital Assets — Custody Banks — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.