Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldMaerki BaumannEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryCustody Banks
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • Switzerland
Regulators / authorities
  • FINMA
Regimes / permissions
  • FINMA bank
  • Bank
Documented services
  • Custody
  • Staking
  • Trading
Security certificationsNot yet structured
Regulatory evidenceMaerki Baumann provides digital-asset services through its regulated Swiss private-bank framework.
Security evidenceThe bank describes multi-level security controls for digital-asset custody, though independent assurance-report scope should be requested for institutional procurement.
Asset protection evidenceIts current custody page describes segregated or omnibus wallet structures, making account architecture an explicit procurement choice.
Procurement caveatConfirm whether the mandate uses segregated or omnibus wallets and obtain current custody terms, sub-custodian details and supported-asset list.

Shortlist summary

Maerki Baumann — Custody Banks — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.