Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

Choose providersEvidence Index

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldKomainuEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryDigital Asset Custodians
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  • Italy
  • Jersey
  • United Kingdom
Regulators / authorities
  • Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA)
  • Organismo Agenti e Mediatori (OAM)
  • Jersey Financial Services Commission (JFSC)
  • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Regimes / permissions
  • Jersey
  • UAE
  • UK
  • Italy
  • VASP — VA Custody Services
  • VASP registration
  • Fund services business + Virtual Asset Service Provider
  • Cryptoasset registration
Documented services
  • Custody
  • Staking
Security certifications
  • SOC 1
  • SOC 2
  • ISO 27001
Regulatory evidenceKomainu publishes regulated custody permissions/registrations across Jersey, the UAE, the UK and Italy.
Security evidenceKomainu publishes SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 assurance/certification.
Asset protection evidenceKomainu states assets are held in segregated on-chain wallets, off balance sheet and in a bankruptcy-remote custody structure.
Procurement caveatConfirm which Komainu legal entity and regulatory perimeter applies to the mandate.

Shortlist summary

Komainu — Digital Asset Custodians — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.