Shortlist comparison
Compare institutional custody providers
Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.
| Comparison field | HashKeyEvidence reviewed |
|---|---|
| Directory category | Digital Asset Custodians |
| Custody model | Custodial |
| Directory verification | unverified |
| Research status | Primary-source evidence reviewed |
| Regulatory jurisdictions |
|
| Regulators / authorities |
|
| Regimes / permissions |
|
| Documented services |
|
| Security certifications | Not yet structured |
| Regulatory evidence | HashKey Group states that client assets for its Hong Kong platform are segregated and held by HashKey Custody Services Limited, a licensed trust/company service provider. |
| Security evidence | HashKey publishes institutional security and certification claims at group/platform level; buyers should verify which certifications cover the custody legal entity. |
| Asset protection evidence | HashKey states client assets are segregated from platform assets and held through the custody entity for the relevant Hong Kong service. |
| Procurement caveat | Do not transfer exchange-level licences or ISO claims automatically to every HashKey entity. Verify the custody company, licence and assurance scope. |
Shortlist summary
HashKey — Digital Asset Custodians — evidence reviewedImportant: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.
