Shortlist comparison
Compare institutional custody providers
Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.
| Comparison field | Fidelity Digital AssetsEvidence reviewed |
|---|---|
| Directory category | Custody Banks |
| Custody model | Custodial |
| Directory verification | unverified |
| Research status | Primary-source evidence reviewed |
| Regulatory jurisdictions |
|
| Regulators / authorities |
|
| Regimes / permissions |
|
| Documented services |
|
| Security certifications | Not yet structured |
| Regulatory evidence | Fidelity Digital Assets has historically operated a New York trust-company custody entity; current mandate scope should be confirmed against current entity documentation. |
| Security evidence | Fidelity publishes physical, cyber and operational controls around its institutional cold-storage custody environment. |
| Asset protection evidence | Specific current insurance/segregation terms were not independently verified in this review. |
| Procurement caveat | Verify current legal entity, asset coverage and custody terms before relying on older regulatory filings. |
Shortlist summary
Fidelity Digital Assets — Custody Banks — evidence reviewedImportant: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.