Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

Choose providersEvidence Index

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldDBS Digital ExchangeEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryCustody Banks
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • Singapore
Regulators / authorities
  • Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
Regimes / permissions
  • Singapore bank / exchange
  • Bank / digital-asset custody ecosystem
Documented services
  • Custody
  • Trading
  • Tokenization
Security certificationsNot yet structured
Regulatory evidenceDBS provides institutional digital custody within its regulated banking/digital-exchange ecosystem; exact service permissions vary by client/entity.
Security evidenceSpecific public SOC/ISO evidence for the digital-custody service was not independently verified in this review.
Asset protection evidenceDBS describes institutional-grade custody; detailed segregation/insolvency treatment should be confirmed contractually.
Procurement caveatConfirm eligibility, jurisdiction and whether custody is provided by DBS Bank or another group entity.

Shortlist summary

DBS Digital Exchange — Custody Banks — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.