Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

Choose providersEvidence Index

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldCrypto.com CustodyEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryExchange Custody
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • United States — Federal / Illinois
Regulators / authorities
  • OCC
Regimes / permissions
  • OCC conditional charter
  • De novo national trust bank
Documented services
  • Custody
  • Staking
Security certifications
  • SOC 1
  • SOC 2
Regulatory evidenceCrypto.com announced conditional OCC approval for a national trust bank charter in February 2026; conditional approval is not the same as a completed charter.
Security evidenceCrypto.com Custody Trust Company publishes SOC 1 Type II and SOC 2 Type II assurance.
Asset protection evidenceCrypto.com describes segregated custody accounts/wallets and insurance coverage; exact terms should be reviewed contractually.
Procurement caveatDo not present the OCC charter as final until completion is confirmed by the OCC.

Shortlist summary

Crypto.com Custody — Exchange Custody — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.