Shortlist comparison
Compare institutional custody providers
Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.
| Comparison field | Bitstamp InstitutionalEvidence reviewed |
|---|---|
| Directory category | Exchange Custody |
| Custody model | Exchange custody via custodial partners |
| Directory verification | unverified |
| Research status | Primary-source evidence reviewed |
| Regulatory jurisdictions | Not yet structured |
| Regulators / authorities | Not yet structured |
| Regimes / permissions |
|
| Documented services |
|
| Security certifications | Not yet structured |
| Regulatory evidence | Bitstamp states customer crypto is held 1:1 in custody and uses third-party custodial partners including BitGo; current Bitstamp by Robinhood materials continue to describe custodian-backed cold storage. |
| Security evidence | Bitstamp has described extensive cold storage and insurance provided through custodial partners; current percentages/policies should be confirmed before procurement. |
| Asset protection evidence | Customer assets are described as held 1:1 and separated from corporate assets, with offline assets held through regulated custodial partners. |
| Procurement caveat | Bitstamp is the exchange/customer relationship, but legal safekeeping may be provided by third-party custodians. Confirm the current custodian by asset/entity. |
Shortlist summary
Bitstamp Institutional — Exchange Custody — evidence reviewedImportant: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.