Shortlist comparison

Compare institutional custody providers

Compare up to four custody-category providers side by side. Evidence-reviewed fields are separated from unverified directory research.

Choose providersEvidence Index

1 provider shortlisted. Unknown values stay unknown and do not imply a negative finding.

Request introductions
Comparison fieldAnchorage DigitalEvidence reviewed
Profile
Directory categoryDigital Asset Custodians
Custody modelCustodial
Directory verificationunverified
Research statusPrimary-source evidence reviewed
Regulatory jurisdictions
  • United States — Federal
Regulators / authorities
  • OCC
Regimes / permissions
  • OCC national trust bank
  • National trust bank
Documented services
  • Custody
  • Staking
  • Settlement
  • Stablecoin services
Security certifications
  • SOC 1
  • SOC 2
Regulatory evidenceAnchorage Digital Bank, National Association received an OCC national trust bank charter and appears in the OCC institution directory.
Security evidenceAnchorage states its custody environment is examined under SOC 1 Type II and SOC 2 Type II reporting.
Asset protection evidenceDigital assets held in custody are subject to bank-grade custody controls; Anchorage disclosures note crypto assets are not FDIC- or SIPC-insured.
Procurement caveatA federal bank charter does not make digital assets FDIC-insured; confirm account structure and asset treatment contractually.

Shortlist summary

Anchorage Digital — Digital Asset Custodians — evidence reviewed
Important: Compare output is a research aid. Confirm current licences, assurance reports, insurance, asset segregation and contractual terms directly with each provider before onboarding.